Akufo-Addo behind lawsuit against anti-gay bill -NDC Chair
The National Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, firmly claims that President Akufo-Addo orchestrated the lawsuit that is supposedly preventing him from signing the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill recently passed by parliament. Asiedu Nketia alleged on Joy News’ PM Express that the President mentioned a lawsuit that had not yet been filed as his reason for not signing the bill, indicating that he was part of a plan to hinder the bill from becoming law. He expressed doubt in the independence of the lawyer who filed the suit, suggesting that he had ties to the government. Asiedu Nketia criticized the President for requesting parliament not to submit the bill to him, stating that the legal action did not prevent the bill from being received, only from being signed. He accused the President of lacking the courage to openly admit that he does not want to sign the bill. The case against the bill is pending in Ghana’s Supreme Court.
Read details
The National Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, has firmly stated that President Akufo-Addo masterminded the lawsuit that is supposedly preventing him from assenting to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill recently passed by parliament.
The experienced politician claimed on Joy News’ PM Express on Wednesday, April 10, that it was not a mere coincidence that the President could refer to a lawsuit that was yet to be filed as the basis for his decision not to sign the bill.
By this, the former NDC General Secretary concluded that the President was part of the plan to frustrate the anti-LGBTQI+ bill from becoming law.
“It is clearly an excuse and it’s a wrong excuse because he [President Akufo-Addo] was citing the court case even before anybody could file it. It tells you that he [President Akufo-Addo] orchestrated the filing.”
As at the time the President spoke, nobody had gone to court. If there’s an intention to file and the person has not filed, how do you restrain yourself over that? So, it means that you don’t want to do something but you want an excuse to cite not to do it. Because if you have heard that somebody is going to court, the person has not gone to court and yet you are injuncting yourself, then it means that you’re part of an orchestration to go to court in the first place.”
Based on this, Mr Asiedu Nketia said, “I don’t trust in the independent-mindedness of whoever that filed the process.”
Pointing to the private legal practitioner cum journalist Richard Dela Sky who filed the suit, the NDC Chair suggested that he was in bed with the government.
“Who doesn’t know the Citi FM man, Richard Sky? Richard Sky works in the chamber of the Attorney-General, and he was sponsored to do his law course by this government. And the man has returned and he’s working with the Majority Leader. There’s circumstantial evidence and that’s my belief.
When the host drew his attention to the wild claims, the NDC Chair insisted that he was privy to those details about the plaintiff and had evidence to back them.
The NDC National Chairman is particularly disappointed that the President asked parliament not to transmit the bill to him.
“I am on the side of Parliament because the President has no reason to ask that Parliament should not submit the bill because the cases that are in court, the last time I checked, there’s no application for an injunction or any actual injunction granted that prevents the President from receiving the bill.
The only application for an injunction that I have seen is to block the President from signing the bill. Receiving and signing are different things. So, if you don’t want to receive the bill, you don’t blame anyone who has gone to court because the reliefs being sought in court do not border on you not receiving. They say don’t work on it. But for the office receiving it, it’s a matter of impunity that is being shown by the President to frustrate the work of parliament” he argued.
Mr Asiedu Nketia believes the President does not want to sign the bill but simply lacks the courage to state that clearly.
“Because parliament has done their work up to a point, and they say to transmit this to the President. You don’t have the right not to receive. You can receive it, and after receiving it, you have options that have been provided under the constitution.
And somebody is in court trying to injunct you from acting on the bill; that injunction does not say don’t receive the bill. So, for you to write to parliament that because I am on some injunction not to sign it, don’t bring it at all, it means you have a pre-meditated agenda. You don’t want to receive it or work on it or do anything with it, but you are not man enough to tell Ghanaians that I don’t want to do it” he noted.
Meanwhile, Ghana’s Supreme Court is yet to sit on the case filed against the bill.
Akufo-Addo not man enough to reject anti-gay bill outright –Asiedu Nketia
The National Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, has accused President Akufo-Addo of lacking the courage to admit that he does not support the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill, also known as the anti-gay bill. Despite being passed unanimously by the House, the bill remains on the desk of parliament.
President Akufo-Addo has stated that he will not sign the bill until the Supreme Court decides on the lawsuit challenging its passage. The NDC has criticized this decision, accusing the President of double standards. They argue that in other cases, such as the controversial E-levy, the President did not hesitate to assent to bills despite legal challenges.
Parliament is upset with the President for instructing them not to transmit the bill to the executive. They have written to the Chief Justice to expedite the legal challenge in response to a similar request made by the Attorney-General.
Speaking on JoyNews’ PM Express, Asiedu Nketia criticized the President’s decision, stating that it shows he does not want to sign the bill but lacks the courage to admit it openly. He alleged that the President orchestrated the lawsuit to prevent him from assenting to the bill, pointing to the plaintiff, Richard Dela Sky, as being in collaboration with the government.
